Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the iPhone XS Max's 84.5 general score. The Galaxy A32 is a newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than iPhone XS Max, although it's also thicker. IPhone XS Max has a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a way better display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a lot higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a way better display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.