Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel XL, with an 84.7 score against 81.3. The Galaxy A32 body is much newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy A32 takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot higher resolution camera and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.