Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. Even though the Galaxy A32 is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and a lot newer. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 OS.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has better 30 fps video frame rate, a larger camera aperture and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A32 counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.