Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Motorola DROID Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is also heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a much better pixel amount per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy A32 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video and better video frame rate.
The Galaxy A32 features improved battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.