Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 81.2. Galaxy A32 is an extremely older, heavier and thicker device than the Motorola Edge 50. Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 works with Android 14 OS. Galaxy A32 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a much higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a quite larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 and Motorola Edge 50 count with quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.