Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic indigo |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 84.7 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy A32's design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it is just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Motorola Moto G Stylus comes with Android 11 OS.
The Moto G Stylus's processing unit is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A32's processor, both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2300 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture. The Moto G Stylus features just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A32 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.