Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gray and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Moto Z4, having a global score of 84.7 against 79.8. Galaxy A32's body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Moto Z4. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and Moto Z4 works with Android 10 OS. Motorola Moto Z4 features a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy A32, they have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Moto Z4 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a greater display density. Moto Z4 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.