Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. Although the Galaxy A90 5G is older and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A32, it's design is still just a little thinner. The Galaxy A90 5G has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a quite bigger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better pixels density.
Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy A32, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels and the same (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.