Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gold |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Galaxy A32's construction is newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it is just a bit heavier and much thicker. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Galaxy C9 Pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
Galaxy C9 Pro's processor is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A32 one, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size. Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot better video definition and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.