Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M30s, having a global score of 84.7 against 83.3. Galaxy A32's design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy M30s's, although it's just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy M30s works with Android 11 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density. Galaxy M30s features just a little better performance than Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Galaxy M30s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.