Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ1's 78.3 global score. The Galaxy A32 design is noticeably newer than Xperia XZ1's, although it's thicker and heavier. Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display density and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Xperia XZ1 features a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xperia XZ1 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xperia XZ1 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A32 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.