Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 79.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2, it's thinner and notably newer. The Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel number per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3180mAh. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.