Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 84.7 against 77.8. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with Android 14 operating system. Galaxy A32's construction is a little lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's way thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 5700mAh battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, because it has a larger aperture, a back camera with more megapixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.