Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 has a global score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Galaxy A40 is a notably lighter device than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide all the same operating system features.
The vivo X70 Pro has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A40 features just a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel count in each inch of screen.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger camera sensor, a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. Vivo X70 Pro counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 44 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.