Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 86.6 against 78.3. Galaxy A50s is an older phone than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s and vivo X70 Pro both count with extremely similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2376 resolution.
Galaxy A50s features slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a more mega pixels camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.