Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Galaxy A51 5G is an older, a little thicker and a bit heavier phone than vivo X70 Pro. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy A51 5G one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A51 5G has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro has a battery life that's just as good as Galaxy A51 5G's battery life, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.