Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is slightly better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy A80 is a notably newer cellphone than Google Pixel XL, but it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A80 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density. Google Pixel XL has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Galaxy A80, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Galaxy A80 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. Galaxy A80 takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also has a bigger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.