Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Galaxy A80's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory and 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has faster video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.