Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a global score of 84.9 against 77.9. The Galaxy A80 is a way newer and somewhat thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A80, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy A80 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.