Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z4, having an 84.9 score against 79.8. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A80 is a heavier and way thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z4. The Samsung Galaxy A80 and the Moto Z4 feature very similar screens, because although the Moto Z4 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A80 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A80 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 3% more battery size. Motorola Moto Z4 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.