Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 84.9 score against 81. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is a lot newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy A80 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with much more MP and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.