Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 77.8. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy A80 design is way older, just a little heavier and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Galaxy A80 counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A80, because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a bit higher pixel quantity in each screen inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A80, because it has a way higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 54% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.