Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite greater display density, a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh. The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher resolution back camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.