Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than the Google Nexus 6P's global score of 80.3. The Galaxy A90 5G construction is notably newer than Google Nexus 6P's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density. The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a way more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.