Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than LG V20, getting a 90.5 score against 77. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is extremely newer than the LG V20's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A90 5G captures much better photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor.
The LG V20 features a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.