Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32, with a score of 90.5 against 84.7. The Galaxy A90 5G body is a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A32, although it's just a bit heavier and was released around a year before. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels. The Galaxy A32 has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.