Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with Android 14 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is notably thicker and was released 5 years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger display and a quite greater pixels amount in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.