Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 90.5 score against 78.8. Even being the best we are comparing, we must note that it's also older, heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, while vivo X60 Pro comes with Android 11 OS. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same sensor size and a 48 MP back-facing camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit superior battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.