Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a global score of 90.5 against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G design is newer and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it is heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to Galaxy A90 5G's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.