Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, with a general score of 81 against 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Google Nexus 6P. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per screen inch.
Google Nexus 6P has a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Nexus 6P shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in low light situations and a much less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.