Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 81 score against 77.9. Galaxy C9 Pro's body is notably newer and a lot thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a much higher pixel density. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 20.7 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.