Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 81. Although the Galaxy A80 is way newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's incredibly thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A80 shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.