Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 83.3 score against 76.4. The Galaxy M30s is a much newer and incredibly thinner phone than Motorola Droid Turbo, but it is also a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better performance than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Galaxy M30s takes better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a F2 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M30s also has better video frame rates and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.