Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy M30s, having a 91.8 score against 83.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M30s were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both devices we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M30s and the Galaxy A71 5G count with quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better resolution back camera, a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy M30s has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.