Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 78.8. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should offer the same operating system features. The Galaxy M30s is a better device than the vivo X60 Pro, we must tell that it's also an older, thicker and a little heavier device.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little larger display. The vivo X60 Pro features more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. Vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.