Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, with an 86.5 score against 81.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy M31 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, we must tell that it is also a lot older, thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking screen than Galaxy M31, because it has a little bit greater number of pixels per inch of display, much more brightness, a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy M31 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy M31 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh. Galaxy M31 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.