Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy M31 construction is a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released a little bit more than a year before.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a higher display density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels and a quite bigger display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro's camera is very similar to the Galaxy M31 one, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot less megapixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.