Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy M31 is extremely older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
Galaxy M31 has a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Galaxy M31, because it has a larger screen, a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, way more screen brightness and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy M31 features a little better battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5% more battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.