Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a score of 86.5 against 78.8. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user very similar OS features. The Galaxy M31 design is older, thicker and a bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Galaxy M31 has a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a way higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.