Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 85 score against 78.3. Galaxy M40's design has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy M40 feature really similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution and a bit bigger screen. The vivo X70 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X70 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.