Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note9's design is extremely older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Edge 50. The Galaxy Note9 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 has a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.