Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 78.8. Galaxy Note9's body is noticeably older, heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X60 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.