Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 88.3 score against 78.3. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give the same OS features. Galaxy S10 is a lighter cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.