Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, with a global score of 87.1 against 81.5. The Galaxy Note9 is a much heavier device than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, but they are 0.35inches thick. Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 2960px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel quantity per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S23 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.