Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 81.5 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra body is incredibly lighter but a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has the older 13 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture and the same camera sensor size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.