Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. Galaxy S7 is a lighter cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 features a better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and better video frame rates.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a much better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.