Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Galaxy S9's design is somewhat lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, but it is a little thicker and was released 4 years before. Galaxy S9 has a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more MP.
The vivo X70 Pro features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.