Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and way heavier than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is still thinner. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Vivo X70 Pro has a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's screen, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. The vivo X70 Pro features as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Galaxy Z Fold 2, both have the same 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and vivo X70 Pro have similar CPUs, both of them have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both feature quite similar batteries, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery size. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.