Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2's score of 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is notably newer and thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2's, but it is a little heavier. Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Xperia XZ2 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a lot higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.