Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is just a bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a global score of 77 against 71.5. Despite of the fact that the LG V20 is extremely older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is thinner and lighter. LG V20 counts with a really superior performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot better looking screen than LG V20, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The LG V20 has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG V20, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a way better video resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.